Question
Which of the following scenarios violates Boyce-Codd
Normal Form (BCNF) in a relational schema?Solution
BCNF is a stricter version of 3NF. A table is in BCNF if, for every functional dependency X→YX , X is a superkey. If a candidate key determines another candidate key, it creates redundancy and violates BCNF. For instance, consider a table where StudentID and CourseID are candidate keys, but CourseID determines StudentID. This means there are multiple possible combinations leading to redundancy. Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
- Option A: This scenario adheres to both 3NF and BCNF, as all non-key attributes depend only on the primary key.
- Option B: This violates 2NF due to partial dependency but does not directly address BCNF.
- Option C: This violates 3NF by allowing transitive dependency but does not necessarily violate BCNF.
- Option E: This statement is a valid condition for both 3NF and BCNF.
(15.15 ×  34.98) + 24.15% of 749.99 = ? + 124.34
?% of 549.83 – 18.05 × 31.96 = 44.94% of 479.84 – 13.98 × 33.13Â
16.98 × 88.05 + 1999.996% of 299.08 + 5.005 % of 4999.997 = ? × 20.98 × 40.009
√28561.11  × √ 960.9  – (18.02)2  =? × 4.95Â
31.98% of 224.99 = 24.98% of ? + 9.91% of 499.99
What will come in place of the question mark (?) in the following series?
2, 4, 12, 60, 420, ?
181.87 ÷ 13.89 X 8.13 + ? = 11.852Â
- What approximate value will come in place of the question mark (?) in the following question? (Note: You are not expected to calculate the exact value.)
- What approximate value will come in place of the question mark (?) in the following question? (Note: You are not expected to calculate the exact value.)
What approximate value should come in the place of question mark in the following questions?
(6.4% of 3125) + (14.9% of 503) = ?