Question
A financial institution notices an unusual pattern in
transactions where large amounts are transferred between new accounts shortly after opening. Which data-driven method would be most effective for detecting potential fraud in this scenario?Solution
Explanation: Supervised machine learning (ML) is an effective approach to detect fraud by learning from labeled historical data of fraudulent and non-fraudulent transactions. In this case, ML models, such as decision trees, random forests, or gradient boosting machines, can analyze patterns in transaction history, account details, and timing to predict suspicious activities. These models can incorporate features like transaction frequency, location anomalies, and unusual amounts to make accurate predictions. By training on labeled data, supervised ML builds robust classifiers that reduce false positives and enhance fraud detection efficiency. This approach also adapts to new fraud techniques when retrained on updated datasets. Option A: Association rule mining identifies relationships between items (e.g., product purchases) but is not suited for fraud detection. Option B: Rule-based systems are static and may generate numerous false positives, failing to adapt to evolving fraud patterns. Option D: EDA identifies trends but is exploratory in nature and does not automate fraud detection. Option E: Dashboards visualize data but lack analytical capabilities for detecting fraud.
Amit and Sara started a business with the investments of Rs. 20,000 and Rs. 30,000 respectively. After one year, Amit increases his investment by Rs. 5,...
P and Q entered into partnership with Rs. 8000 and Rs. 12000 respectively. After 4 months P withdrew `1/4` of his stock but after 4 months more he put b...
Two firms, X and Y, began a joint venture by investing in a ratio of 9:16. After six months, Firm Y withdrew its entire investment. At the end of the ye...
M and N started a business by investing Rs.4000 and Rs.5000 respectively. After 7 months, M and N increased their investments by 30% and Rs.2400 respect...
βAβ and βBβ invested Rs. 4800 and Rs. 3600, respectively in a business, together. After 6 months, βAβ withdrew 25% of his initial investment...
βAβ, βBβ and βCβ started a business by investing Rs. 3,000, Rs. 3,600 and Rs. 2,400, respectively. After 6 months, βBβ decreased his inv...
A, B and C invest in a partnership in the ratio 8:5:10 and investment of A is Rs.200 less than investment of C. Partner B invests for 1/5th and A and C ...
βAβ invested Rs. 3500 in a business. βBβ joined x months later with an investment of Rs. 2500. If at the end of the year, Bβs share in the pro...
βCβ and βDβ entered into a business by investing Rs. βyβ and Rs. βy + 300β, respectively. After 10 months βCβ invested Rs. 400 more ...
P and Q started a business by investing Rs.5600 and Rs.4000 respectively. After 6 months, Q increased his investment by a certain percentage such that a...