Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Restrictions that were done away with after the introduction of the electoral bond scheme: Statement I is correct -: Earlier, no foreign company could donate to any political party under the Companies Act Statement II is not correct -: A firm could donate a maximum of 7.5 per cent of its average 3 year net profit as political donations according to Section 182 of the Companies Act Statement III is correct -: As per the the Act, companies had to disclose details of their political donations in their annual statement of accounts. The government moved an amendment in the Finance Bill to ensure that this proviso would not be applicable to companies in case of electoral bonds.
R ead the given question and decide which of the following options is required to answer the question.
Question:
Piyush bou...
Select the option that represents the letters that, when placed from left to right in the following blanks, will complete the letter-series.
G _ ...
Ten people are sitting in two parallel rows 1 and 2. A, B, C, D and E are sitting in row 1 facing the North and V, W, X, Y and Z are sitting in row 2 fa...
The two statements in this question and the two conclusions related to them are given in the form of i and ii, assuming that the statements given in the...
Three statements are followed by four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to consider these statements to be true, even if they seem at va...
In the question below, some letters are given in two ovals, intersecting each other. The letter(s) given in the intersected portion can be used more tha...
Figure X is followed by four figures numbered (1), (2), (3), (4). Identify the figure among the four in which figure X is embedded (i.e. contains figure...
According to the logic used in the first pair, replace the question mark with the appropriate option
MJ : HE :: GW : ??
CASE : DCVI :: PACK : ?
In a certain code language, 'SUGAR' is coded as 81 and 'FILL' is coded as 51. How will 'CREAM' be coded in that language?