Question
This question consists of a sentence which is divided into
four parts numbered (1) to (4). Only one part of the sentence is not acceptable in standard written English. Identify that part which contains an error.Solution
This sentence is an example of a third conditional structure, which refers to hypothetical past events and their consequences. The correct form should be "she would not have" instead of "she will not have" because:The past perfect ("Had she been more cautious") correctly sets up the condition.The result clause should use "would have + past participle" to indicate what could have happened if the condition had been met.Corrected Sentence:"Had she been more cautious, she would not have fallen victim to such a well-planned fraud."
What is the estimated life expectancy reduction due to air pollution in northern India?
What is the capital city of Armenia?
Which of the following is known as the Rain forests of the oceans?
What is the primary aim of the SPARSH initiative by the Ministry of Defence?
In which year was the Shipping Corporation of India (SCI) founded?
Recently India extended USD _____ financial assistant to ______ to ease economic challenges.
Which Hungarian author won the Nobel Prize in Literature in 2025?
Which company received final approval from the RBI to operate as an online payment aggregator in India?
The Government of India recently extended the Smart Cities Mission period up to which date?
Which platform is supporting Coca Cola India's initial association with ONDC for leveraging data-driven insights and market intelligence?