Question
This question consists of a sentence which is divided into
four parts numbered (1) to (4). Only one part of the sentence is not acceptable in standard written English. Identify that part which contains an error.Solution
This sentence is an example of a third conditional structure, which refers to hypothetical past events and their consequences. The correct form should be "she would not have" instead of "she will not have" because:The past perfect ("Had she been more cautious") correctly sets up the condition.The result clause should use "would have + past participle" to indicate what could have happened if the condition had been met.Corrected Sentence:"Had she been more cautious, she would not have fallen victim to such a well-planned fraud."
What is the main objective of the SHRESHTA Scheme?
Which of the following initiatives is associated with the Ministry of Cooperation?
Insurance Mall portal has been launched by ______ for its customers to ensure an Easy-buy experience.
Deficit financing is a tool of which economic policy?
What does the economic term 'Cross Demand' relate to?
National Level Pollution Response Exercise, NATPOLREX, it was its 8th edition this year is conducted by?
Who has the authority to impose agricultural tax in India?
Who has been appointed as the first woman to lead ONGC(Oil and Natural Gas Corporation)?
Which of the following metric is not an indicator of growth of a nation?
 In the new integrated food security scheme, Pradhan Mantri Garib _______Ann Yojana, what comes in the blank?