Question
India paid the price for not including a third pacer in
Akash Deep, who sitting out to accommodate a three-man spin attack . In each question below, a sentence is given with a part of it printed in bold type. That part may contain a grammatical error. Each sentence is followed by phrases 1), 2), 3) and 4). Find out which phrase should replace the phrase given in bold to correct the error, if there is any, and to make the sentence grammatically meaningful and correct.ÂSolution
The correct structure should be "who sat out to accommodate," as "sat out" is the correct past tense form of the verb, and "to accommodate" properly follows it. The sentence is describing a past event, so the verb tense must align.
Three statements, showing relationship between different elements, are followed by three conclusions (I). (II) and (III). Assuming the statements to be ...
Statements:
P > O ≥ D > M ≤ Y < L; M > G > Q
Conclusions:
I)Â O > Q
II) L < G
...Statements: B > D = C ≥ E ≥ G, C = H ≤ I < F
Conclusions:
I. B > H
II. I ≥ G
III. F > DIn the question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the conclusion (s) among given three conclusions is/are definitely true and th...
If A = B, C ≥ D, A < D and  E > B , then which of the following conclusion is true?
Statement- 1 - 6# ≥ 9# ≥ 10# ≤ 5#
2 - 7* ≤ 10# ˃ 5* ≥ 6*
Conclusions:
1) 5# > 5*
2) 9# ˃ 6*
3) ...
Statements: E < F > G; H < I ≤ F; E > D
Conclusions:
I. F > D
II. H < E
III. G < D
Statements: Z % Y; X # W; U % V; W & V; Y @ X
Conclusions:Â Â Â Â Â
I. U @ X Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ...
Which of the following symbols should replace the sign ($) and (*) respectively in the given expression in order to make the expression F ≥ J and P...
Statements: Q > W > X; J > W; Z < X < P
Conclusions:
I. P > Z
II. J > Q
III. W < P
Relevant for Exams:
