In each of the following questions, two columns are given containing three sentence fragments each. In the first column, the fragments are labelled A, B, and
C. In the second column, the fragments are labelled D, E, and F. You are required to match the fragments from Column I with the fragments from Column II to form grammatically correct and contextually meaningful sentences. Choose the option that provides the correct combination(s).

• A-F: Logically connects the action of the labor conventions ("dictate") with the dependent clause ("that all member states must eradicate..."), forming a grammatically perfect mandate. • C-E: The infinitive phrase "To circumvent..." sets up a motive, which is logically followed by the main clause detailing the shady corporate action ("established proxy servers"). • Why B-D fails: Contextual and grammatical errors. First, "Despite" requires a contrasting outcome, but the scientific community "embracing" the theory isn't a contrast to the evidence—it's a direct logical result. Second, the clause lacks a main finite verb; "embracing" is a participle. It would need to be "embraced" to even be grammatically complete, though the contextual flaw with "Despite" would still remain.