Question
Which is the SIXTH (LAST) sentence of the
paragraph? Rearrange the following six sentences a, b, c, d, e and f in the proper sequence to form a meaningful paragraph; then answer the questions given below them. a) The Supreme Court verdict of May 2014 striking down a statutory provision for prior government clearance for a Central Bureau of Investigation probe against officials of the rank of joint secretary and above is the touchstone against which the constitutionality of the pre-investigation sanction requirement will be tested. b) The Union government, too, has a set of amendments to the Prevention of Corruption Act pending since 2013, including a proviso for prior sanction. c) The court had observed that such a provision destroys the objective of anti-corruption legislation, blocks the truth from surfacing, thwarts independent investigation and forewarns corrupt officers. d) This is the first time a section prescribing punishment for disclosure is being introduced in India, though provisions barring investigation or prosecution without prior sanction are also in force in Maharashtra. e) Anti-corruption legislation in India seems to be in a state of unacceptable flux. f) However, the time limit for the sanctioning authority to act is 180 days in Rajasthan, and 90 days in Maharashtra.Solution
d f b a c e This is the first time a section prescribing punishment for disclosure is being introduced in India, though provisions barring investigation or prosecution without prior sanction are also in force in Maharashtra. However, the time limit for the sanctioning authority to act is 180 days in Rajasthan, and 90 days in Maharashtra. The Union government, too, has a set of amendments to the Prevention of Corruption Act pending since 2013, including a proviso for prior sanction. The Supreme Court verdict of May 2014 striking down a statutory provision for prior government clearance for a Central Bureau of Investigation probe against officials of the rank of joint secretary and above is the touchstone against which the constitutionality of the pre-investigation sanction requirement will be tested. The court had observed that such a provision destroys the objective of anti-corruption legislation, blocks the truth from surfacing, thwarts independent investigation and forewarns corrupt officers. Anti-corruption legislation in India seems to be in a state of unacceptable flux.
Rs. 10400 was divided among A, B and C in the ratio 2:3:3. B kept Rs. 1200 for himself, gave Rs. 500 to his mother and divided the remaining money among...
Total population of city P and Q is 3410 and 4620 respectively. If the ratio of number of males to females in city is P and Q is 7:4 and 4:3 respectivel...
Some amount was divided among A, B and C in the ratio 3:5:8. If the share of A is 40 less than share of C, then find the 1/4th of total amount (in Rs).
84 is divided into two parts in such a way that the fourth part of the first part and the fifth part of the second are in the ratio 1 : 2. The first par...
Rs.1581 is divided among A, B and C in the ratio 10 : 15 : 6. What is the share of B?
P and Q together have Rs 2,420. If 8/15 of P’s amount is equal to 4/5 of Q’s amount, how much amount does Q have?
Ratio of males to females in village ‘A’ and village ‘B’ is 3:4 and 5:6, respectively and number of females in village ‘B’ is 25% more than ...
The ratio of the two numbers is 4:9. 140% of the first number is equal to the 70% of the second number. Find the sum of both the numbers.
A sum of Rs.2400 is distributed among A, B, C in the ratio of 3:7:10. What is the total amount received by A and B?
The ratio of two numbers A and B is 9:19 and C is 60% of the average of the numbers A and B. If the sum of A, B and C is 182, then what is the value of A?