Question
Which is the THIRD sentence of the
paragraph? Rearrange the following six sentences a, b, c, d, e and f in the proper sequence to form a meaningful paragraph; then answer the questions given below them. a) The Supreme Court verdict of May 2014 striking down a statutory provision for prior government clearance for a Central Bureau of Investigation probe against officials of the rank of joint secretary and above is the touchstone against which the constitutionality of the pre-investigation sanction requirement will be tested. b) The Union government, too, has a set of amendments to the Prevention of Corruption Act pending since 2013, including a proviso for prior sanction. c) The court had observed that such a provision destroys the objective of anti-corruption legislation, blocks the truth from surfacing, thwarts independent investigation and forewarns corrupt officers. d) This is the first time a section prescribing punishment for disclosure is being introduced in India, though provisions barring investigation or prosecution without prior sanction are also in force in Maharashtra. e) Anti-corruption legislation in India seems to be in a state of unacceptable flux. f) However, the time limit for the sanctioning authority to act is 180 days in Rajasthan, and 90 days in Maharashtra.Solution
d f b a c e This is the first time a section prescribing punishment for disclosure is being introduced in India, though provisions barring investigation or prosecution without prior sanction are also in force in Maharashtra. However, the time limit for the sanctioning authority to act is 180 days in Rajasthan, and 90 days in Maharashtra. The Union government, too, has a set of amendments to the Prevention of Corruption Act pending since 2013, including a proviso for prior sanction. The Supreme Court verdict of May 2014 striking down a statutory provision for prior government clearance for a Central Bureau of Investigation probe against officials of the rank of joint secretary and above is the touchstone against which the constitutionality of the pre-investigation sanction requirement will be tested. The court had observed that such a provision destroys the objective of anti-corruption legislation, blocks the truth from surfacing, thwarts independent investigation and forewarns corrupt officers. Anti-corruption legislation in India seems to be in a state of unacceptable flux.
'рдЖрда рдмрдбрд╝реЗ рдЪреЛрд░ рдкрдХрдбрд╝реЗ рдЧрдпреЗ рдереЗ, рдкреБрд▓рд┐рд╕ рдХреА рд▓рд╛рдкрд░рд╡рд╛рд╣реА рд╕реЗ рдЖрдзреЗ рдЪреЛрд░ рднрд╛рдЧ я┐╜...
тАЬрдЬрд┐рд▓рд╛рдзрд┐рдХрд╛рд░реА рдиреЗ рд╕рдмрдХреЛ рдЙрдкрд╕реНрдерд┐рдд рд░рд╣рдиреЗ рдХрд╛ рдирд┐рд░реНрджреЗрд╢ рджрд┐рдпрд╛ рд╣реИтАЭ рдореЗрдВ я┐╜...
рд╢реБрджреНрдз рд╡рд╛рдХреНрдп рдХреА рдкрд╣рдЪрд╛рди рдХреАрдЬрд┐рдпреЗ -
'рдорд╛рдБ рдиреЗ рдмрдЪреНрдЪреЗ рдХреЛ рдмреБрд▓рд╛рдпрд╛' рдореЛрдЯреЗ рдЕрдВрд╢ рдореЗрдВ рдХреМрди рд╕рд╛ рдХрд╛рд░рдХ рд╣реИ?
'рдЙрдБрдЧрд▓реА рдЙрдард╛рдирд╛' рдореБрд╣рд╛рд╡рд░реЗ рдХрд╛ рд╕рд╣реА рдЕрд░реНрде рд╣реИ:
рд╢реБрджреНрдз рд╡рд╛рдХреНрдп рдХрд╛ рдЪрдпрди рдХреАрдЬрд┐рдпреЗ -
тАШрдорди рд░реЗ рддрди рдХрд╛рдЧрдж рдХрд╛ рдкреБрддрд▓рд╛ , рд▓рд╛рдЧреИ рдмреВрдВрдж рдмрд┐рдирд╕рд┐ рдЬрд╛рдп рдЫрд┐рди рдореЗрдВрдЧрд░рдм рдХрд░я┐╜...
рд╡рд╛рдХреНрдп рдореЗрдВ рдкреНрд░рдпреБрдХреНрдд рд╢рдмреНрджреЛрдВ рдореЗрдВ рдкрд░рд╕реНрдкрд░ рд╕рд╛рдордВрдЬрд╕реНрдп рдХреЛ рдХрд╣рддреЗ рд╣реИя┐╜...
┬атАШрдмрд╛рдгрднрдЯреНрдЯ рдХреА рдЖрддреНрдордХрдерд╛' рдХрд┐рд╕ рд╡рд┐рдзрд╛ рдХреА рдкреБрд╕реНрддрдХ рд╣реИ :
рдордЬрд┐рд╕реНрдЯреНрд░реЗрдЯ рд╢рдмреНрдж рд╣реИ -