Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the four given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All Cycles are Buses. Some Bikes are Cycles. No Bus is Train. Conclusions: I. Some Bikes are Buses is a possibility. II. Some Cycles are Trains is a possibility. III. Some Trains are Bikes.Solution
Some Bikes are Cycles (I) + All Cycles are Buses (A) → Some Bikes are Buses (I). Hence conclusion I does not follow. All Cycles are Buses (A) + No Bus is Train (E) → No Cycles is a Train (E). Hence conclusion II does not follow. Some Bikes are Buses (I) + No Buses is Train (E) → Some Bikes are not Train (O). Hence conclusion III does not follow.
Come, take a ________.
Choose the word(s) that have been correctly spelt and mark your answer accordingly.Â
Find out the wrongly spelt word.
Hound
In the following question select the answer pair that expresses a relationship most similar to that expressed in the capitalised pair.
Parsimon...
Choose the word that is nearest in meaning to the bold word:
Pernicious
The one who treats eye defects, injuries, and diseases.
Select the most appropriate synonym of the bold word in the given sentence.
The promises made by the old minister were fulfilled.
There exists rancour between the two brothers.
Choose the correct ANTONYM for the given word.
ExonerateÂ