Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All floor is apartment. No flat is floor. All flat is building. Conclusions: I. A few building being apartment is a possibility. II. Some apartment is not flat.Solution
No flat is floor (E) + All floor is apartment (A) → Some apartment are not flat (O) + All flat is building (A) → Probable conclusion → Some building may be apartment (I). Hence conclusion I and II follow.
If a person makes non-natural use of his land by collecting there something which is likely to do mischief by escape, he will be liable if the thing so...
The National Company Law Tribunal shall be constituted by ________________
Under Section 12(1) of the Limitation Act, 1963, which day is excluded when computing the period of limitation?Â
Is a settlement agreement reached through community mediation enforceable as a civil court decree under The Mediation Act, 2023?
Any charge for Impeachment of President may be preferred
Under Section 163(1), a Magistrate may issue an urgent order in cases of nuisance or apprehended danger to—
Narrowing of “criminal misconduct” under the 2018 amendment of the PC Act means:
What is the role of Agriculture and Consumer Protection Department of the FAO?
The Investigating Authority shall have the power to keep in his custody any books, registers, other documents and record produced under this regulation ...
Which is required to prove disproportionate assets according to the PC Act?