Question
In the question below there are some statements
followed by some conclusions. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions definitely follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Only a few Umbrella is Coats. All Streets are Coats. No Street is a Water. Conclusions: I. Some Streets can be Umbrellas. II. Some Coats can be Water. III. Some Water are not Umbrellas.Solution
Only a few Umbrella is Coats (I) + [All Streets are Coats (A) → Conversion] → Some Coats are Streets (I) → Probable conclusion → Some Streets can be Umbrellas (I). Hence conclusion I follows but conclusion III does not follow. All Streets are Coats (A) → Conversion → Some Coats are Streets (I) + No Street is a Water (E) → Some Coats are not Water (O) → Probable conclusion → Some Coats can be Water (I). Hence conclusion II follows.
Which of the followings is definitely true about
“H @ K % P @ S $ G”?
Statements: T < U ≤ V = W ≤ S = Y < X = Z
Conclusions:
I. S > T
II. X ≥ U
In a family of six members, C is the daughter of U’s daughter only brother. E is the daughter-in-law of L, who is husband of U. Z is brother of B, the...
There are five members in the family. Q is father-in-law of B, who is sister-in-law of D. W is mother of D. O is the only brother of D. Q is married. Wh...
U is the daughter in law of whom among the following
Which among the following statement is definitely incorrect?
S is the grandmother of _____.
Archit is brother of Priyanka who is married to Manish. Manish is father of Arijit who is father in law of Rakesh and has two children, then how Archit ...
T is _____ of ______.
If expression ‘F @ B $ C ? G @ D ? E’ is true, then how is B’s mother’s father in law is related to F’s mother’s father?
...