Question
In the question below are given some statements
followed by some conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Few lamps are lights. All lights are bulbs. Only bulbs are competitors. Conclusions: I: Some bulbs are lamps. II: No competitor is light.Solution
Few lamps are lights (I) + All lights are bulbs (A) β Some lamps are bulbs (I) β Conversion β Some bulbs are lamps (I). Hence conclusion I follows. Only bulbs are competitors β All competitors are bulbs and competitors can have negative relation with anyone. Hence conclusion II follows.
Which of the following is NOT a principle of organic farming as per IFOAM?
Which WTO agreement addresses the protection of human, animal, and plant health?
Which Indian organization helps exporters meet international food trade requirements and offers infrastructure support?
What is the key environmental benefit of organic farming?
A system in which forest trees are grown along with agricultural crops and grasses on the same land at the same time is known as ____
What is the full form of SPS in WTO agreements related to agri trade?
Which of the following is a dicotyledonous weed?
What is the main economic advantage of organic farming for smallholders?
Which Ministry governs the functioning of APEDA?
What does the conversion period in organic farming refer to?