Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: No pilot is lawyer. Some pilot are engineer At least some engineer are scientist. Conclusions: I. Some pilot are scientist. II. No lawyer is engineer. III. Some lawyer being scientist is a possibility.Solution
Some pilot are engineer (I) + At least some engineer are scientist (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion I does not follow. Some pilot are engineer (I) → Conversion → Some engineer are pilot (I) + No pilot is lawyer (E) → Some engineer are not lawyer (O). Hence conclusion II does not follow. At least some engineer are scientist (I) → Conversion → Some scientist are engineer (I) + Some engineer are not lawyer (O) → Probable conclusion → Some lawyer may be scientist (I). Hence conclusion III follows.
Name the bank which has been recently put by RBI under Corrective Action Framework (PCA).
Consider the following statements in regards to 38th Amendment Act, 1975:
1. This Act amended Articles 123, 213 and 352 of the Constitution
<...Gupta inscriptions suggest that there were small kingdoms of Nag clans in north India (especially Garhwal), which Gupta king ruled over Nag Chieftains?
Who won the Syed Mushtaq Ali cricket trophy?
Which of the following Planet is known as ‘Winter Planet’?
With which of the following type of loans the term “teaser rate” is associated?
Which city is known as the Gate-way of Rajasthan ?
Saina Nehwal reached the final of the Indonesia Masters Super 500 tournament by defeating _______?
When was the World Wide Web (WWW) created by Tim Berners-Lee?
Which ministry has launched the 'Vishvasya-Blockchain Technology Stack'?
Relevant for Exams:
