Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: No pilot is lawyer. Some pilot are engineer At least some engineer are scientist. Conclusions: I. Some pilot are scientist. II. No lawyer is engineer. III. Some lawyer being scientist is a possibility.Solution
Some pilot are engineer (I) + At least some engineer are scientist (I) โ No conclusion. Hence conclusion I does not follow. Some pilot are engineer (I) โ Conversion โ Some engineer are pilot (I) + No pilot is lawyer (E) โ Some engineer are not lawyer (O). Hence conclusion II does not follow. At least some engineer are scientist (I) โ Conversion โ Some scientist are engineer (I) + Some engineer are not lawyer (O) โ Probable conclusion โ Some lawyer may be scientist (I). Hence conclusion III follows.
Who led Op Drishti, the surgical camp that performed over 400 surgeries?
Which state has planned the genetic enhancement of its indigenous Badri cow?
Who was reappointed as the Secretary, Department of Defence R&D and Chairman of DRDO until May 31, 2025?
Ministry of Railways announced the recruitment of the Indian Railways Management Service (IRMS) will be done through ___?
What is the indigenous content percentage in the Tejas Mk-1A aircraft?
Who has been appointed as the first woman Chairman and CEO of Railway Board?
- Who inaugurated the APEDA Pavilion at the AAHAR 2025 exhibition?
Mission Karmayogi, also known as the National Programme for Civil Services Capacity Building, was launched in which year?
Which insurance company has launched the payment facility for premium through WhatsApp and UPI?
Nikhat Zareen is associated with which sport?ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย