Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: No pilot is lawyer. Some pilot are engineer At least some engineer are scientist. Conclusions: I. Some pilot are scientist. II. No lawyer is engineer. III. Some lawyer being scientist is a possibility.Solution
Some pilot are engineer (I) + At least some engineer are scientist (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion I does not follow. Some pilot are engineer (I) → Conversion → Some engineer are pilot (I) + No pilot is lawyer (E) → Some engineer are not lawyer (O). Hence conclusion II does not follow. At least some engineer are scientist (I) → Conversion → Some scientist are engineer (I) + Some engineer are not lawyer (O) → Probable conclusion → Some lawyer may be scientist (I). Hence conclusion III follows.
Assessment of learner's portfolio is:
If a teacher gives scores to correct responses in a class-test and enlists total marks of each learner, he/she has done:
When was the National Adult Education Programme (NAEP) launched?
William Kilpatrick popularised the __________.
What would you do if you notice that students tend to doze off in your class?
A teacher uses a rubric to assess students’ written essays. This is an example of:
To make learning effective, a goal must be meaningful in terms ______ ?
What is the use of text book in a class?
Which of the following statements defines the basic philosophy, theory, and practice of teaching children according to critical pedagogy?
Identify whether the following statements are correct or incorrect:
1. RUSA was launched in 2013 as a Centrally Sponsored Scheme (CSS).
2....
Relevant for Exams:
