Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the four statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: 83.3% rubbers are tails No tails are bands Every bands are hairs. Conclusions: I. Some rubbers are bands II. A few tails are hairsSolution
83.3% rubbers are tails (I) + No tails are bands (E) → Some bands are not rubbers (O). Hence conclusion I does not follow. No tails are bands (E) + Every bands are hairs (A) → Some hairs are not tails (O*). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
How much profit did the Japanese multinational investment firm Softbank Group make by selling further stake in PB Fintech through the open market?
Which trio among the following is referred to as 'The Trinity of Carnatic music'?
A multiple-choice question paper has 50 questions. Each question has got four options, namely A, B, C and D. Each correct answer carries 4 marks and eac...
Which one of the following is NOT correctly matched?
Which Five-Year Plan aimed at accelerating food grain production, increasing employment opportunities and raising productivity with focus on 'food, work...
In Uttarakhand, which one of the following areas is not covered under the ‘State Integrated Co-operative Development Project?
Which disease is caused by NOT having enough vitamin C in the diet for at least 3 months leading to weakness, anaemia, gum disease and skin problems?
Which of the following works of Kalidasa is based on the context of the birth of Kartikeya, the son of God Shiva and Goddess Parvati?
How are two bones attached to each other in a human body?
What is the minimum pension provided under the NPS Vatsalya scheme?