Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All Cumin are Species. All Walnut are Figs. Some Walnut are species. Conclusions: I. Some Cumin is walnut. II. Some Figs are not Cumin.Solution
All Cumin are Species (A) ā Some Species areĀ Cumin (I). Some Walnut are species (I) + Some Species areĀ Cumin (I) ā No conclusion. Hence neither conclusion I nor II follow.
Which of the following collision resolution techniques involves storing all elements that hash to the same value in a linked list?
Deletion in Red-Black Trees maintains balance using:
Which data structure is most suitable for implementing a priority queue with logarithmic time complexity for insertion and deletion?
Which cryptographic concept ensures that data integrity is preserved and cannot be altered during transmission?
Which of the following is an example of an emerging technology that is most likely to impact the future of computing?
The amortized cost of appending an element at the end of a dynamic array is:
Time complexity of heap sort is:
KMP improves naive string matching by:
Which network topology ensures full redundancy but is highly expensive and complex to implement?
Which of the following statements about parameter passing in Python is TRUE?
