Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All Cumin are Species. All Walnut are Figs. Some Walnut are species. Conclusions: I. Some Cumin is walnut. II. Some Figs are not Cumin.Solution
All Cumin are Species (A) → Some Species are Cumin (I). Some Walnut are species (I) + Some Species are Cumin (I) → No conclusion. Hence neither conclusion I nor II follow.
Which of the following is a fundamental concept of Object-Oriented Programming (OOP)?
What is the backbone of MIS?
Which access specifier makes members accessible only within the class itself?
Abstraction in OOP primarily focuses on:
Which of the following statements best describes a "trap door" in the context of computer security?
Which statement is FALSE for analog input module for PLCs?Â
State true or false
This scheduling algorithm is not ideal for time sharing systems.
The order of convergence of Newton-Raphson method is:
A function sum_matrix_elements(matrix, R, C) is designed to sum all elements of a matrix with R rows and C columns. The implementation uses nested loops...
Polymorphism, meaning "many forms," allows objects of different classes to be treated as objects of a common superclass. Which of the following best des...
