Question
In the questions given below, there are three
statements followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Only a few Cake is Candle Some Candle is Party No Candle is Sticker Conclusion: I. Some Cake is not Sticker II. Some Party is Sticker is a possibility III. No Sticker is PartySolution
Only a few Cake is Candle (I) + No Candle is Sticker (E) → Some Cake is not Sticker (O). Hence conclusion I follows. Some Candle is Party (I) → Conversion → Some Party is Candle (I) + No Candle is Sticker (E) → Some Party is not Sticker (O) → Probable conclusion → Some Party may be Sticker (I). Hence conclusion II follows but conclusion III does not follow.
Any change in the name of the person indicated in the Memorandum of One Person Company as a nominee ________________________
‘A’ instigates ‘B’ to murder ‘C’. But ‘B’ refuses to do so. Has “A” committed any offence?
Select correct answer using opti...
Fundamental Duties was inserted in the Constitution of India by which of the following Amendments?
What is the maximum time frame within which a suit filed under the provisions of this Act must be disposed of by the court as per the Specific Relief Act?
As per the provisions of the Companies Act One Person Company shall have minimum ______________ director
According to IPC in a cognizable offence a police officer_______.
A Public Company is a company which has a minimum paid-up share capital ____________
As per the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 Money-Laundering means Whosoever directly or indirectly attempts to indulge or knowingly assists or ...
A Continuing Guarantee applies to_______________
What is Abridge Prospectus?