Question
In the following question below are given some
statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements: All FG is XC. Some QQ is FG. All XC is HY. Conclusions: I. Some FG is not HY. II. Some QQ is HY. III. All FG is HY.Solution
All FG is XC (A) + All XC is HY (A) → All FG is HY (A). Hence conclusion I does not follow but conclusion III follows. Some QQ is FG (I) + All FG is XC (A) → Some QQ is XC (I) + All XC is HY (A) → Some QQ is HY (I). Hence conclusion II follows.
In an LLP out of the designated partners:
Imputation of truth made for public good_________________.
Where a banking company appropriates any sum or sums from the reserve fund or the share premium account, it shall, within _______________, report the fa...
Under the Insurance Act, 1938 , which of the following is the minimum paid-up capital requirement for a company to carry out life or general insurance b...
The authority to alter the boundaries of states in India lies with
A is accused of the murder of B by beating him. Whatever was said or done by A or B or by the by-standers at the beating, or so shortly before or after ...
What does the principle of Caveat Emptor imply in the context of a contract of sale according to Section 16 of the Sale of Goods Act?
For how long can the Registrar reserve a name for a limited liability partnership after satisfying the prescribed conditions and payment of the fee?
No person shall be appointed by the State Government as the Public Prosecutor or Additional Public Prosecutor for the district unless his name appears i...
The superintendence of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in so far as it relates to investigation of offences alleged to have been committed under ...
Relevant for Exams:
