Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Consignments are Trackers. Only Trackers are Universal. Some Trackers are not Transaction. Conclusion: I. Some Universal are Consignments II. Some Transaction can be Consignments.Solution
Only Trackers are Universal → All Universal are Trackers and Universal cannot have any positive relation with anyone. Hence conclusion I does not follow. Some Consignments are Trackers (I) + Some Trackers are not Transaction (O) → Probable conclusion → Some Transaction can be Consignments (I). Hence conclusion II follows.
As per Section 5 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act regarding the extent of judicial intervention in matters governed by Part I, which of the follo...
According to Prof. Dicey, what are the three meanings or principles of the Rule of Law?
a. Supremacy of Law
b. Equality b...
Right to property is a:
In case of a transfer of dwelling house by one of the co-owners______.
According to Clause 1 of Article 25 of the Indian Constitution, the freedom of religion is subject to the interest of:
What does the word “legal injury” mean?
Which provision of Consumer protection act 2019 talks about rights of consumers?
As per the IBC, 2016 a Financial Creditor means______________
Which of the following sections of Limitation Act deals with effect of substituting or adding new plaintiff or defendant?
Who are the persons by whom a promise is to be performed as per the Contract Act?