Question
Statements: All frames are photos. No
photo is wood. Only few woods are designs. Conclusions: I. A few designs may be photos. II. All woods being designs is a possibility. In the question below there are three statements followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
No photo is wood (E) + Some woods are designs (I) β Some designs are not photos (O*) β Probable conclusion β Some designs may be photos (I). Hence conclusion I follows. Only few wood is design β Some woods are designs (I) and Some woods are not designs (O). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
Which of the following is a challenge in machine translation?
EPN stands for :
What is the primary advantage of using an Object-Oriented Programming approach?
Consider the following JSON object:
json
{
Β "user": {
Β Β "id": "u123",
Β Β "name": "Alice",
Β Β "age"...
Which statement is FALSE regarding Zener diode?
What is the backbone of MIS?
Which of the following is a characteristic of "tight coupling" between software modules?
Address is which type of attribute?
fill the blank for space 14.
What is the time complexity for inserting an element into a binary heap?