Question
Three statements are given, followed by three
conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statement: Some Fighter are Trainers. All Trainers are Pilot. No Trainer is a Soldier. Conclusions: (I) Some Pilot are not Soldier. (II) All Soldier being Fighter is a possibility. (III) No Soldier is FighterSolution
All Trainers are Pilot (A) β Conversion β Some Pilot are Trainers (I) + No Trainer is a Soldier (E) β Some Pilot are not Stine (O). Hence conclusion I follows. Some Fighter are Trainers (I) + No Trainer is a Soldier (E) β Some Fighter are not Soldier (O) β Probable conclusion β All Soldier may be Fighter (A). Hence conclusion II follows but conclusion III does not follow.
Answer the questions based on the information given below.
Seven persons Suresh, Manav, Vinita, Krisha, Harsh, Gargi and Varun are in the famil...
There are five members T, U, V, W, and Y in the family. V is married to Y. Tβs mother is daughter of U. W and T are male members. Y is brother of W. H...
Eight persons P, Q, R, S, T, U, V and W are from two generations and four married couple. V and T are married couples. P is father in law of U, who is s...
How many male members are there in the family?
How is R related to N?
Which of the following is definitely false?
Which among the following statement is definitely incorrect?
How is W related to T?Β
Answer the questions based on the information given below:
There are seven members D, E, F, G, H, I, and J in a family of three generation. E i...
How is P related to Q?