Question
Three statements are given, followed by three
conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statement: Some Fighter are Trainers. All Trainers are Pilot. No Trainer is a Soldier. Conclusions: (I) Some Pilot are not Soldier. (II) All Soldier being Fighter is a possibility. (III) No Soldier is FighterSolution
All Trainers are Pilot (A) → Conversion → Some Pilot are Trainers (I) + No Trainer is a Soldier (E) → Some Pilot are not Stine (O). Hence conclusion I follows. Some Fighter are Trainers (I) + No Trainer is a Soldier (E) → Some Fighter are not Soldier (O) → Probable conclusion → All Soldier may be Fighter (A). Hence conclusion II follows but conclusion III does not follow.
A demand curve measures
In 2005, which pathological scientist received the Borlaug Award?
Optimum LAI for crops with horizontally oriented leaves is ____
Land area needed to raise settlings for transplanting in 1 ha through spaced transplanting method of sugarcane
Short term credit is usually for a period of ranging up to:
Stroma and grana membranes are present in
Which one of the soil component has highest CEC?
The agricultural practice where two or more crops are cultivated sequentially on the same land within a single year is known as:
Foliar diagnosis of nutrient status developed for sugarcane crop is known by the nameÂ
Yellow vein mosaic disease of okra is a viral disease.Â
Which of the following insects spreads the disease?
Relevant for Exams:
