Question
Three statements are given, followed by three
conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statement: Some Fighter are Trainers. All Trainers are Pilot. No Trainer is a Soldier. Conclusions: (I) Some Pilot are not Soldier. (II) All Soldier being Fighter is a possibility. (III) No Soldier is FighterSolution
All Trainers are Pilot (A) → Conversion → Some Pilot are Trainers (I) + No Trainer is a Soldier (E) → Some Pilot are not Stine (O). Hence conclusion I follows. Some Fighter are Trainers (I) + No Trainer is a Soldier (E) → Some Fighter are not Soldier (O) → Probable conclusion → All Soldier may be Fighter (A). Hence conclusion II follows but conclusion III does not follow.
When did the Court Fees Act came into force?
A rescues B, a person in lawful custody, and in so doing causes grievous hurt to C, a constable in whose custody B was. A may be charged with?
Arbitral tribunal means:
The LIC Act came into force on which date?
A agrees to buy from B a certain horse, it turns out that the horse was dead at the time of bargaining though neither party was aware of the fact.
The IRDA Act, 1999 came into force on ______________
The ____________ shall be responsible for carrying out the safety oversight and regulatory functions as per the provisions of the Aircraft Act 1934
When a person asserts any fact before the court which gives rise to any legal right or liability, the burden of proof lies on__________?
Under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, Section 13, partners are entitled to which of the following by default?
In food industry, GAP stands for?
Relevant for Exams:
