Question
Two statements are given followed by three conclusions
numbered I, II, and III assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Decide which of conclusion logically follow(s) from the statement. Statements: Some kite is paper All paint is kite Conclusions: I. No paint is paper II. Some kite is paint III. Some paint being paper is a possibilitySolution
All paint is kite (A) + Some kite is paper (I) ā No conclusion. Hence conclusion I does not follow. All paint is kite (A) ā Conversion ā Some kite is paint (I). Hence conclusion II follows. All paint is kite (A) + Some kite is paper (I) ā Probable conclusion ā Some paint may be paper (I). Hence conclusion III follows.
Central Bank of Kaishala directly controls the money supply, with real money balances set at #1600. Government expenditures is #250 and taxes are #200....
Elistan can produce either 5 monster trucks or 10 cans of silly string in a day. What is the opportunity cost of one can of silly string?
ā All Giffen goods are inferior, but all inferior goods are not Giffenā. The statement isĀ
An economist calculated the cross-price elasticity of demand for nicknacks and gizmos and got -0.5. What can she conclude about the relationsh...
When an individualās consumption decreases the wellbeing of others, but the individual does not compensate those others. It is the case of__________....
A distribution of 6 scores has a median of 21. If the highest score increases 3 points, the median will becomeĀ
Which of the following statements is NOT correct in the context of quantity theory of money?
If the exchange rate of some economy depreciates visāaāvis US $ and if the Marshal Lerner condition is satisfied, then the current account deficit o...
Which of the follow statements about price discrimination is not true?
If indirect taxes are subtracted and subsidies are added to Net Domestic Product at market price we get
Relevant for Exams:
