Question
Two statements are given followed by three conclusions
numbered I, II, and III assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Decide which of conclusion logically follow(s) from the statement. Statements: Some kite is paper All paint is kite Conclusions: I. No paint is paper II. Some kite is paint III. Some paint being paper is a possibilitySolution
All paint is kite (A) + Some kite is paper (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion I does not follow. All paint is kite (A) → Conversion → Some kite is paint (I). Hence conclusion II follows. All paint is kite (A) + Some kite is paper (I) → Probable conclusion → Some paint may be paper (I). Hence conclusion III follows.
Article 323A of the Constitution empowers Parliament to establish:
Under Section 11(4)(a) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, if occupier wilfully absents himself when sample is taken:
Which of the following is true regarding the registration of establishments under the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020?
Children under the Act are defined as individuals below the age of:
Under Section 19(1)-(2), what is the relationship between arbitral proceedings and mandatory procedural codes?
The auditor may be removed from his office before the expiry of his term only by a _______________ of the company, after obtaining the previous approval...
Any person aggrieved by an order of the Board made before the commencement of the Securities Laws (Second Amendment) Act, 1999 may prefer an appeal to ...
If the court asks a question which is of such a nature that the truth of the imputation conveyed would affect the opinion of the Court as to the credib...
Who can prefer an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal against an order made by the Adjudicating Authority under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act?
Which of the following entities qualifies as an "insurer" according to the Insurance Act?
Relevant for Exams:
