Question
Statements: Only a few necklaces are chains.
No chain is a bracelet. All bracelets are bangles. Conclusions: I. No bangle is chain. II. A few necklaces are not bracelets In the question below there are four statements followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the four given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the four statements disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
No chains are bracelets (E) + All bracelets are bangle (A) → Some bangle are not chains (O*). Hence conclusion I does not follow. Only a few necklaces are chains (I) + No chains are bracelets (E) → Some necklaces are not bracelets (I). Hence conclusion II follows.
Which famous sorting algorithm uses the divide-and-conquer strategy?
What is the correct syntax to declare a variable in C?
In SQL, which keyword is used to retrieve data from a database?
A firewall that monitors the state of active connections and makes decisions based on the context of those connections is known as a:
What is the main purpose of the parity bit in error detection?
Which component is responsible for translating virtual addresses to physical addresses?
What is the scope of a variable declared as "static" inside a function?
How can the Banker's algorithm be used to prevent deadlocks?
The java.sql and javax.sql are the primary packages for JDBC 4.0.
In tuple calculus, what does the ∃ symbol represent?
Relevant for Exams:
