Question
Statement:Â Few penguins are parrot.
At-most some penguin are sparrow. Only a few sparrows are peacock. Conclusion: I. Some sparrows are parrot. II. All parrot can be penguin. III. All sparrows can be peacock. IV. No sparrows are parrot. In each of the questions below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even, if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known factsSolution
How many proviso are there to Section 92 of Evidence Act?
No banking company shall hold any immovable property howsoever acquired_________________
Which section of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 deals with previous sanction necessary for prosecution?
How is a contract of sale made according to the Sale of Goods Act, 1930?
Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, which of the following statements best reflects the admissibility of electronic evidence?
As per the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, whoever attempts to commit an offence referred to in section 13(1) (a) shall be punishable with imprisonm...
The mortgagor ostensibly sells the mortgaged property in-
Section 82 of IPC provides that nothing is an offence which is done by a child under:
Mark the incorrect statement towards the Admissibility under the Act_______.
The rescission of a voidable contract may be communicated or revoked in the same manner, and subject to the same rules, as apply to the ________________