Question
In the question two statements are given, followed by
three conclusions, I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement Some plates are cups. All cups are spoons. Conclusion I : Some spoons are plates. Conclusion II : All spoons are cups. Conclusion III : Some cups are plates.Solution
Some plates are cups (I) + All cups are spoons (A) → Some plates are spoons (I) → Conversion → Some spoons are plates (I). Hence conclusion I follows. All cups are spoons (A) → Conversion → Some spoons are cups (I). Hence conclusion II does not follow. Some plates are cups (I) → Conversion → Some cups are plates (I). Hence conclusion III follows.
Under Section 2(47) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which of the following would NOT qualify as an unfair trade practice?
Salomon v. Salomon & Co. established which core principle?
Specific relief can be granted for enforcing__________________
In which of the ways can a contract be discharged?
Imputation of truth made for public good_________________.
According to Section 36(2) of the Code on Wages, 2019, what happens if there is no available surplus for a particular accounting year?
When should a person be reimbursed for paying money which is due to be paid by another?
According to Section 2(g) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 'judgment' means _______.
What was the purpose of establishing the Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparenc...
Right to Education is a ________ as introduced by _________ Committee Recommendations.
