Question
Statements : All blues are whites. Some whites
are reds. All yellows are reds. Conclusions : I. Some reds not being whites is a possibility. II. Some yellows are whites. III. Some reds are blues. In each of the questions below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
Some whites are reds(I)⇒ Probable conclusion ⇒ Some reds may not be whites (I). Hence, conclusion I follows. All yellows are reds(A) + Some reds are yellows(I) ⇒ No conclusion. Hence, conclusion II does not follow. All blues are whites (A) + Some whites are reds (I) ⇒ No conclusion. Hence, conclusion III does not follow. 
As per section 201 of the Contract Act an agency is terminated by___________________
Which of the following a not a secondary evidence?
The Supreme Court's landmark judgment inĀ Chetan v. The State of KarnatakaĀ established a critical principle regarding circumstantial evidence. The cas...
Section 9 of the Specific Relief Act provides that in a suit for specific performance of a contract _____________________
Which of the following as per Competition Act, 2002 is exempted as anti-competitive agreement?
A. copyright
B. patent
C. trad...
Who is referred to as the āData Principalā under the Act?
As per Explanation 5 of Section 46, in abetment by conspiracy, which of the following isĀ not necessary?
The establishment, recognition and application of common sanitary and phytosanitary measures by Members is called
Doctrine of part-performance is covered under which section of the Transfer of Property Act?
The "Golden Rule" of interpretation of statutes is also known as:Ā
