Question
Statements:Some villages are towns. Some towns
are huts. All huts are rivers. Some rivers are tents. Conclusions:I. Some tents are towns. II. Some rivers are towns. III. Some huts are villages. In each question below are given four statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known factsSolution
Some towns are huts(I) + All huts are rivers(A) ⇒ Some towns are rivers(I) + Some rivers are tents(I) ⇒ No Conclusion. Hence conclusion I does not follow. Some towns are huts(I) + All huts are rivers(A) ⇒ Some towns are rivers(I) ⇒ Conversion ⇒ Some rivers are towns(I). Hence conclusion II follows. Some villages are towns(I) + Some towns are huts(I) ⇒ No conclusion. Hence conclusion III does not follow.
Which of the following is NOT a principle of organic farming as per IFOAM?
Which WTO agreement addresses the protection of human, animal, and plant health?
Which Indian organization helps exporters meet international food trade requirements and offers infrastructure support?
What is the key environmental benefit of organic farming?
A system in which forest trees are grown along with agricultural crops and grasses on the same land at the same time is known as ____
What is the full form of SPS in WTO agreements related to agri trade?
Which of the following is a dicotyledonous weed?
What is the main economic advantage of organic farming for smallholders?
Which Ministry governs the functioning of APEDA?
What does the conversion period in organic farming refer to?