Question
Statements: All watches are clocks. Some wall
clocks are calculators. Conclusions: I. No watch is a calculator. II. Some calculators are not clocks. In each question below are given two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Give Answer:Solution
Both the statements are positive statements and we know that no definite conclusion can be drawn from the negative statements. Hence, neither conclusion I nor conclusion II will follow.
N has only two daughters U and P. P is married to O. O is father of S. U is married to V. B is daughter-in-law of P. How is S related to N?
Which of the following can be the correct conclusion drawn from the expression
‘P % Q + R @ S % T’
Which of the following statements is/are definitely correct?
How is D related to E?
Who among the following person is the son of G?
How is E related to I?
How is V related to W?
Who is the grandmother of A? Â Â
How is S related to W?
Pointing to Sushmita, a man said, 'She is the only daughter of my daughter's paternal grandmother How is that man related to Sushmita?