Question
Statements: Some children are parents. All
parents are infants. Some infants are adolescent. Conclusions: I. At least some adolescent are parents. II. All infants being parents is a possibility. III. Some infant are definitely children. IV. Some parents are adolescent. In each question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV are given. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
All parents are infants(A) + Some infants are adolescent(I) ⇒ No conclusion. Hence conclusion I and IV does not follow. All parents are infants(A) ⇒ Conversion ⇒ Some infants are parents(I) ⇒ Probable conclusion ⇒ All infants being parents is a possibility(A). Hence conclusion II follow. Some children are parents(I) + All parents are infants(A) ⇒ Some children are infants (I) ⇒ Conversion ⇒ Some infant are children(I). Hence conclusion III follows. ALTERNATE SOLUTION: Relevant Minimal Possibility: 
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance...
Sunil starts walking from Point R. He walks 28 m towards the west, turns right and walks for 20 m to reach point M. He then takes a left turn, walks for...
BE17 is related to DJ51 in a certain way. In the same way, GJ23 is related to NT69. Which of the following are conect matches following the same logic?<...
P, Q, R, S, T, U and V are standing in a queue.
i. T is just behind P.
ii. V is just in front of Q, who is not the last person.
iii...
Which figure should replace the question mark (?) in the following series to continue the pattern?
Statements: Some leaves are old. All old are clothes. Some clothes are papers.
Conclusion I: All leaves are old.
Conclusion II: Some old are clothes.
Select the option that is related to the third letter-cluster in the same way as the second letter-cluster is related to the first letter-cluster.
<...In a certain code language. 'COCK' is written as 'EQEM', and 'DUCK' is written as 'FWEM'. How will 'SWAN' be written in that language?
In the following question, a group of letters is given which are numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Select that combination of numbers so that letters arranged...
Identify the figure that completes the pattern.
