All parents are infants(A) + Some infants are adolescent(I) ⇒ No conclusion. Hence conclusion I and IV does not follow. All parents are infants(A) ⇒ Conversion ⇒ Some infants are parents(I) ⇒ Probable conclusion ⇒ All infants being parents is a possibility(A). Hence conclusion II follow. Some children are parents(I) + All parents are infants(A) ⇒ Some children are infants (I) ⇒ Conversion ⇒ Some infant are children(I). Hence conclusion III follows. ALTERNATE SOLUTION: Relevant Minimal Possibility: 
What is the composition of the Authority under the IRDA Act, 1999?
Where an appeal is preferred against any order of the Recovery Officer, under section 30, by any person from whom the amount of debt is due to a bank or...
Which of the following is the most appropriate option?
1. Judicial decisions are not a source of International Law
2. Juristic...
A contract which provides for the delivery of goods and the payment of a price therefor, either immediately, or within such period not exceeding eleven...
When is an offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 compoundable?
According to Section 36(2) of the Code on Wages, 2019, what happens if there is no available surplus for a particular accounting year?
Where both the parties to an agreement are under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is__________________
What is the key element in a negligence claim?
As per SEBI (Depositories and Participants) Regulations 2018, which of the following is true
As per the Negotiable Instrument Act in a promissory note or bill of exchange the expressions “at sight” and “on presentment” means_____________...
