Question
Statement : No mobiles is a charger. Some
chargers are not phones. No phone is a bell. Conclusion : I. No mobile is a bell. II. Some mobiles are not phones. III. Some chargers are mobiles. In each question below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
No mobiles is a charger(E) + Some chargers are not phones(O) ⇒ No conclusion. Hence Conclusion I and II will not follow. No mobiles is a charger(E) ⇒ Conversion ⇒ Some chargers are not mobiles(O). Hence Conclusion III will not follow.
In the context of ADTs, what does "encapsulation" refer to?
What is the primary role of lexical analysis in the compilation process?
Which of the following best describes a transistor?
Physical limitation of a signal is called?
Arrange the following memory components in the memory hierarchy from the fastest to the slowest: Cache memory, Main memory (RAM), Hard disk.
What does cardinality represent in the context of an ER model?
Which of the following techniques is used for dimensionality reduction while preserving the data’s variance?
Type-checking is normally done during
Basic syntax to create a bar-chart in R is
Which type of routing is manually configured by a network administrator and does not change auAtomatically?