šŸ“¢ Too many exams? Donā€™t know which one suits you best? Book Your Free Expert šŸ‘‰ call Now!

    Question

    There has been a rise in opposition to laws that require

    drivers and passengers to wear seat belts in a car. People have argued that in a free society, people have the right to take decisions regarding risks as long as they do not harm others. Thus, they conclude that it should be the decision of the individual whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, weakens the conclusion? In the question given below, a passage is given followed by three statements which may or may not strengthen or weaken the argument conveyed by the passage. Select the correct combination of statements that strengthen/ weaken the argument as per the individual direction.
    A New models have automatic seat belts that do not give an option to the driver. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    B People travelling in airplanes are supposed to wear seat belts during turbulence. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    C Insurance premiums for car owners are higher because insurers need to cover for the injuries or deaths of people who do not wear seat belts. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    D The average number of accident related deaths in countries that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is lesser than those countries that have such laws. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    E All of the above Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

    Solution

    Ā (c) is the right answer. In the premise, it has been argued that people should be allowed to take risks if they do not harm others. But, C establishes that someoneā€™s decision of not wearing a seat belt will harm others as well (Car owners have to pay higher premiums).

    A is irrelevant as it is unrelated to the conclusion.

    B is incorrect. The statement is related to airplanes and not automobiles.

    D is incorrect. It strengthens the conclusion.

    Practice Next
    More Strong and Weak Argument Questions

    Relevant for Exams:

    ask-question