Question
In each question below is given a statement followed by
two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Statement: To improve road safety, the city administration has mandated that all commercial vehicles be equipped with speed governors that limit maximum driving speed. Conclusions: I. The city administration believes overspeeding by commercial vehicles is a major cause of road accidents. II. Commercial vehicle drivers have been demanding speed governors to reduce their workload.Solution
The mandate aims to improve road safety through the installation of speed governors. This implies an underlying belief that over speeding contributes significantly to road accidents, so Conclusion I follows. Nothing in the statement suggests that drivers have requested speed governors, or that workload reduction is related to the decision. Hence, Conclusion II does not follow.
What is the primary output of the lexical analysis phase of a compiler?
What is a primary advantage of generating intermediate code during compilation?
Which parsing method uses a stack and an input buffer?
Which phase of a compiler is responsible for creating a stream of tokens from the input source code?
If an expression `x = a + b` is computed, and later in the same basic block, `y = a + b` is computed, a compiler can apply which optimization?
Which of these is used for resolving operator precedence in parsing?
Which data structure is commonly used in the implementation of recursive descent parsing?
What is the purpose of Normalization in database design? Â Â Â Â Â
Which parsing technique is a top-down parser that cannot handle left recursion and requires the grammar to be free of common prefixes?
A "parser" is primarily responsible for which phase of compilation?