Question
In the question below some statements are given
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion definitely follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Tamarind is Cumin. All Cumin is Coriander. No Spices is Cumin. All Spices is Coriander. Conclusions: I. Some Spices is not Coriander. II. No Coriander is Tamarind. III. All Coriander can never be Cumin.Solution
All Spices is Coriander (A) → I.I. → Some Spices is Coriander (I). Hence conclusion I does not follow. Some Tamarind is Cumin (I) + All Cumin is Coriander (A) → Some Tamarind is Coriander (I). Hence conclusion II does not follow. All Cumin is Coriander (A) → Probable conclusion → All Coriander can never be Cumin (A). Hence conclusion III follows.
- The Anti-Defection Law was introduced through which Constitutional Amendment Act?
Who was awarded the 'Order of the Druk Gyalpo' by Bhutan's King Jigme Khesar Namgyal Wangchuck?
Who won the 2024 Nobel Prize in Physics?
'Windows' is related to 'Operating System', in the same way as 'MS Word' is related to '____'.
Which of the following statements is/are true with respect to the newly launched PM Vishwakarma scheme-
I. PM Vishwakarma scheme has been launche...
The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money was authored by:
On which dates will the Congress hold its MLA training camp at Mandu (MP)?
K.Viswanath has passed away at the age of 92. To which profession did he belong to?
What is the 2025 theme for World Chagas Disease Day?
The Prime Minister has released the 15th installment of the Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi (PM-KISAN) scheme transferring an amount of _______ to m...