Question
In the question below some statements are given
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion definitely follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Tamarind is Cumin. All Cumin is Coriander. No Spices is Cumin. All Spices is Coriander. Conclusions: I. Some Spices is not Coriander. II. No Coriander is Tamarind. III. All Coriander can never be Cumin.Solution
All Spices is Coriander (A) → I.I. → Some Spices is Coriander (I). Hence conclusion I does not follow. Some Tamarind is Cumin (I) + All Cumin is Coriander (A) → Some Tamarind is Coriander (I). Hence conclusion II does not follow. All Cumin is Coriander (A) → Probable conclusion → All Coriander can never be Cumin (A). Hence conclusion III follows.
The maximum number of times a president can be re-elected in India is?
Where the amount to be spent by a company for the Corporate Social Responsibility Policy _____________, the requirement for the constitution of the Corp...
As per section 6 of the National Investigating Agency Act __________________ shall have the jurisdiction with respect to a Scheduled Offence if it has b...
“The interpretation which is not in conflict with the intent of statute should be opted for”. This is the principle of
When can a creditor, member, or partner of a corporate debtor apply to the Adjudicating Authority to declare undervalued transactions void and reverse i...
According to Code 88 of the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020, if an offence is committed by a company, who can also be deem...
Which of the following is a primary duty of a trustee under the Indian Trusts Act, 1882?
Which of the following is Principals duty towards an Agent?
Agreement is defined in Section _____ of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
Which one of the following is not the function of EIC?