Question
A statement is given followed by two conclusions
numbered I & II. Assuming the statement to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.  Statements: Australians are strengthened by Pat Cummins' return for the final test after serving a suspension. Cummins was suspended for breaching COVID-19 protocols and missed the third test. However, his absence did not impact Australia’s performance as initially feared.  Conclusions: I. Pat Cummins was suspended for applying saliva to the ball, violating the new playing rules introduced due to the COVID-19 pandemic. II. Australians were able to secure a favorable result in the 3rd test match.Solution
The statement mentions that Pat Cummins was suspended for violating COVID-19 protection norms but does not specify the exact nature of the offense. As a result, Conclusion I cannot be drawn based on the available information. Â The latter part of the second sentence states that Cummins' absence did not affect the team's performance as initially feared. This implies that, despite his absence, Australia managed to achieve a favourable result. Therefore, Conclusion II is logical and correct. Â Hence, the correct answer is (B).
Feelings of guilt or regret
It's many years ____________ Mount Vesuvius last erupted.
Ravi said,” Good night Manav! We will meet again tomorrow.”
The old man has been cheated by the seller.
The lovely main
P- bars and restaurants.
Q- coffee houses,
R- street is packed with
The complete loss or absence of hope
I said to my friend,” Let us go to some hill station.”
Let us have it please.
They’re scattered
P- and are not the
Q- traditional Christmas lights
R- throughout the old town
Fill in the blanks with suitable articles like ‘a’, ‘an’and ‘the’ :
_______ good education is important.
