Question
In the question below some statements are given
followed by two conclusions I, and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion definitely follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: 100% Hen are Chick Some Pig are Chick No Chick are Piglet Conclusions: I. Some Piglet are Pig II. At least Some Hen are PigSolution
Some Pig are Chick (I) + No Chick are Piglet (E) → Some Pig are not Piglet (O). Hence conclusion I does not follow. 100% Hen are Chick → Conversion → Some Chick are Hen (I).Some Pig are Chick (I) + Some Chick are Hen (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow.
SEBI power to direct any person to investigate into the affairs of any intermediary or person associated with the securities market is given under Sect...
Suits other than for compensation for wrongs done to person or immovable property shall be filed at:
Legal disability of limitation Act applies in case of:
Central Government can supersede the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority for a maximum period of …… for mentioned reasons.
When the question before the court of law is –
whether a given document is the will of A, Then the state of A’s property and of his family ...
Among the following sections which is not deals with the presumptions of fact________.
Partner's liability for acts of the firm is___?
The principle “facts speak for themselves” can be expressed by the maxim_______
The accused in the instant case was charged for killing a person by driving over him. A witness saw the vehicle at a high speed, but did not see the ac...
According to the provisions of the Companies Act, within how many days of incorporation must a company have a registered office capable of receiving and...