Question
Which of the following statement is/are true?
I) T sits second to the right of W II) Only one person sits between V and Y when counted from the left of V III) X sits opposite to U IV) No one sits between X and Z Study the following information carefully and answer the below questions. Eight persons- S, T, U, V, W, X, Y and Z are sitting on the rectangular table facing the centre but not necessarily in the same order. Three of them sit at each long side where one person sits at each smaller side. The consecutive alphabetically named persons are not sitting together. The number of persons sits between X and W is the same as the number of persons sit between W and S. Z sits second to the right of X who sits on the smaller side of the table.┬а The number of persons sits between U and S is one more than the number of persons sit between V and X when counted from the right of both U and V. W sits second to the right of T. Only two persons sit between Z and V.Solution
We have, Z sits second to the right of X who sits on the smaller side of the table. Only two persons sit between Z and V. From the above condition, there are two possibilities. Case-1  Again we have, W sits second to the right of T. From the above condition, there are three possibilities.
 Again we have, W sits second to the right of T. From the above condition, there are three possibilities.  Case-2
 Case-2  Again we have, The number of persons sits between X and W is the same as the number of persons sit between W and S. The number of persons sits between U and S is one more than the number of persons sit between V and X when counted from the right of both U and V. From the above condition, case1 and case2 get eliminated. Case2a shows the final arrangement.
 Again we have, The number of persons sits between X and W is the same as the number of persons sit between W and S. The number of persons sits between U and S is one more than the number of persons sit between V and X when counted from the right of both U and V. From the above condition, case1 and case2 get eliminated. Case2a shows the final arrangement. 
- 1957 рдореЗрдВ рдЧрдард┐рдд рд╕рдВрд╕рдж рдХреА рд░рд╛рдЬрднрд╛рд╖рд╛ рд╕рдорд┐рддрд┐ рдХреЗ рдЕрдзреНрдпрдХреНрд╖ рдХреМрди рдереЗ ? 
- рджрд┐рдП рдЧрдП рдЕрдВрдЧреНрд░реЗрдЬреА рд╢рдмреНрджреЛрдВ рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдП рдПрдХ рд╣рд┐рдиреНрджреА рдкрд░реНрдпрд╛рдп рдХрд╛ рдЪрдпрди рдХреАрдЬрд┐... 
- рд╕рдЬрд╛рд╡рдЯ/рд╕реБрд╡рд┐рдзрд╛рдПрдБ рдореЗрдВ 'amicus curiae' рд╢рдмреНрдж рдХрд╛ рдЙрдкрдпреБрдХреНрдд рд╣рд┐рдВрджреА рдкрд░реНрдпрд╛рдп рдХреНя┐╜... 
- тАШ рдПрдХ рдмреВрдВрдж рд╕рд╣рд╕рд╛ рдЙрдЫрд▓реА тАЩ рдХрд┐рд╕ рд╡рд┐рдзрд╛ рдХреА рд░рдЪрдирд╛ рд╣реИ ? 
- abide by рдХрд╛ рд╣рд┐рдиреНрджреА рдЕрд░реНрде рд╣реИ 
- рдирд┐рдореНрдирд▓рд┐рдЦрд┐рдд рдореЗрдВ рд╕реЗ рдХреМрди рд╕рд╛ тАШcountry risk assessment - рд╢рдмреНрдж рдХрд╛ рд╡рд┐рддреНрддреАрдп рд╢рдмреНя┐╜... 
- рд░рд╛рдЬрднрд╛рд╖рд╛ рдирд┐рдпрдо, 1976 рдХреЗ рдирд┐рдпрдо 11 рдХреЗ рдЕрдВрддрд░реНрдЧрдд рд╕рд░рдХрд╛рд░реА рдХрд░реНрдордЪрд╛рд░реА рдХреЛ рдХрд╛я┐╜... 
- рдзрд╛рд░рдХ рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдП рд▓рд┐рдП рд╕рд╣реА рдкрд╛рд░рд┐рднрд╛рд╖рд┐рдХ рд╢рдмреНрдж рд╣реИ 
- рдирд┐рдореНрдирд▓рд┐рдЦрд┐рдд рд╢рдмреНрджреЛрдВ рдкрд░ рд╡рд┐рдЪрд╛рд░ рдХреАрдЬрд┐рдП : - 1. ┬а рдЙрдиреНрдирддреА - 2. рджреБрд░рдЧрдо <... 
- рдЗрдирдореЗ рд╕реЗ рдХреНрдпрд╛ тАШNotionalтАЩ рдХрд╛ рд╕рд╣реА рдЕрд░реНрде рдирд╣реА рд╣реИ?