Get Started with ixamBee
Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
There are three persons sit between O and N. The person who sits two places away from N sits fourth to the right of M. M sits neither adjacent to O nor adjacent to S. The person who sits immediate left of the vacant seat sits two places away from O. 
Q does not sit adjacent to O. R sits two places away from Q. The number of persons who sits between N and R is one less than the number of persons who sits between S and Q. M does not sit at the end. Q does not sits right of N. 
T sits adjacent to N. This eliminates case 1a. The number of persons who sits between Q and P is same as the number of persons who sits between T and O. This eliminates case 1 and 1a. so final case-2 Case-2 
Which of the following symbols should replace the sign (@) respectively in the given expression in order to make the expression P ≥ O and D > K defin...
Statements:
P ≤ Q < R > K; R < S > T; T < U < V
Conclusions:
I). P < S
II). P ≥ S
...Statements: Z % Y; X # W; U % V; W & V; Y @ X
Conclusions:
I. U @ X �...
Which of the following will be definitely true if the given expression Y > Z ≥ H > J ≥ P > Q = R ≤ K > E ≤ F is definitely not true?
Statements:
A $ B % D % C
Conclusions:
I. B © C
II. A * D
III. C % A
Statements:
O ≤ P = Y ≤ U; L > G ≥ W = Q ≥ Y; G < A ≤ R < D
Conclusions:
I. P < R
II. G ≥ P
Statements:
E ≤ A > J ≥ L; Y > J < D
Conclusions:
I. D > L
II. A > L
Statements: B & Y, Y # M, M $ X, X @ S
Conclusions: I. X $ Y II. X & Y
...Statements:
Z > N ≥ B = J ≤ M; Y ≥ U > N ≥ P
Conclusions:
I). P ≤ Z
II). M > Y
...Statements: T @ A % S $ L © J
Conclusions:
I. T % L
II. T $ L
III. S # J
