Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
STEP I: M sits third to the left of O who sits an immediate neighbour of S. Three persons sit between Q and S who sits second to the left of N. As per these statements, we can say that there are three possible cases and the arrangement will look like this:
STEP II: R sits to the immediate left of P who sits second to the left of M. Both R and Q sit adjacent to each other. The number of persons sits between P and S is one less than the number of persons sits between S and R when counted from the right of both P and S respectively. At least one person sits between N and R when counted from the right of N. As per these statements, CASE I and CASE III get eliminated and we continue with CASE II and the final arrangement will look like this:
Pardon may be tendered to an accomplice under Section 306 CrPC when
Which of the following is a new type of company which was introduced by the Companies Act, 2013?
When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all:
What is the maximum amount of interim compensation that can be granted by the Court under Negotiable Instruments Act?
In which of the following case the supreme court has declared S. 303 of IPC as unconstitutional?
A contingent contract _____________
The fast-track corporate insolvency resolution process shall be completed within ___________
Which of the following emergencies has been declared for the maximum time in India:
What is the minimum and maximum number of directors required in a public company as per the Companies Act, 2013?
As per S.96 of CPC an appeal shall not lie against-