Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
STEP I: M sits third to the left of O who sits an immediate neighbour of S. Three persons sit between Q and S who sits second to the left of N. As per these statements, we can say that there are three possible cases and the arrangement will look like this:
STEP II: R sits to the immediate left of P who sits second to the left of M. Both R and Q sit adjacent to each other. The number of persons sits between P and S is one less than the number of persons sits between S and R when counted from the right of both P and S respectively. At least one person sits between N and R when counted from the right of N. As per these statements, CASE I and CASE III get eliminated and we continue with CASE II and the final arrangement will look like this:
For n=100, given that the regression of X on Y is 4Y-6X+240 = 0 The mean of Y=100 and variance of X is 4/9 times the variance of Y. Calculate the coeffi...
A country Kaishala imposes a 10% tariff on imported vehicles but no tariff on imports of machinery or other inputs to the manufacture of vehicles. Suppo...
In the case of cost-push inflation, other things being equal:
If two dice are thrown together, what is the probability of getting an even number on one dice and an odd number on the other dice?
What is the mean of a data if its Pearson's coefficient of skewness is 0.25, standard deviation is 7 and mode is 20.
Consider the matching-pennies game:
Let p= probabi...
Autocorrelation violates which assumption of CLRM?
In the case of cost-push inflation, other things being equal:
If income elasticity is less than 1 then the goods are