Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
STEP I: M sits third to the left of O who sits an immediate neighbour of S. Three persons sit between Q and S who sits second to the left of N. As per these statements, we can say that there are three possible cases and the arrangement will look like this:
STEP II: R sits to the immediate left of P who sits second to the left of M. Both R and Q sit adjacent to each other. The number of persons sits between P and S is one less than the number of persons sits between S and R when counted from the right of both P and S respectively. At least one person sits between N and R when counted from the right of N. As per these statements, CASE I and CASE III get eliminated and we continue with CASE II and the final arrangement will look like this:
Which of the following will have the largest value while calculating national income?
Which of the following statement best describe the role of a “deflator”?
Which of the following transaction is being ignored while calculating national income?
Which of the following is not a method to calculate GDP?
Due to which of the following reasons increase in absolute and per capita real GNP do not connote a higher level of economic development?
If two or more than two goods are used to satisfy the same want, they are called
Which of the following may lead to a shift in the demand curve?
What should be done in an economy to reduce the effects of recession?
Which of the following asset belongs to the flow concept?
Which one of the following transactions will be considered as a transfer payment?