Question
Who sits facing
Z? Study the following information carefully and answer the below questions. There are three rows Row1, Row2 & Row3. Row1 is immediate north of row2 and Row3 is immediate south of Row2. Eight person sits in row2 and 4 person sits in each row1 and row3. First four person from left end of row2 sits facing person in row1, similarly first four person from right end of row2 sits facing person from row3. N sits third to right of D, who sits facing Q. L sits third to right of K. M and K doesn’t sit together. Neither L nor K sits at end of the row. Y neither sits adjacent to Q nor sits adjacent to N. No person sits left of Q. Z sits in any row north of O’s row. The one who sits facing Y, sits second to right of M. X sits immediate left of J, who sits facing south. K sits facing R, who sits immediate right of G. One person sits between P and F, who sits facing A.Solution
We have: N sits third to right of D, who sits facing Q. No person sits left of Q. That means, in case (1) Q sits at left end of Row1, in case (2) Q sits left end of Row3. L sits third to right of K. Neither L nor K sits at end of the row. K sits facing R, who sits immediate right of G. That means, in case (1a) L sits immediate left of D, in case (1b) L sits immediate right of D, in case (2a) L sits immediate left of D, in case (2b) L sits immediate right of D. Based on above given information we have: Case-2a
Again, we have: The one who sits facing Y, sits second to right of M. M and K doesn’t sit together. Y neither sits adjacent to Q nor sits adjacent to N. That means, in case (1a) M sits immediate right of Q, in case (1b) M sits immediate left of N, in case (2a) M sits immediate right of M, in case (2b) M sits immediate left of N. One person sits between P and F, who sits facing A. That means, in case (1b) A sits immediate right of R, in case (2b) A sits immediate right of A, case (1a) & case (2a) are not valid. X sits immediate left of J, who sits facing south. That means, in case (2b) X sits immediate right of Y, case (1b) is not valid. Z sits in any row north of O’s row. That means, in case (2b) Z sits immediate left of Y and O sits immediate left of L. Based on above given information we have final arrangement as follows:
Case (1a) & case (2a) are not valid as one person sits between P and F, who sits facing A, case (1b) is not valid as X sits immediate left of J, who sits facing south.
The Maharashtra Rent Control Act applies to which type of premises in the first instance?
(PYQ) Under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, "Retrenchment" means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for any reason whatsoeve...
To be a member of the House of People, minimum age prescribed is:
An accused person apprehends arrest for a cognizable offence and seeks protection through bail before arrest. Under which section of the Bharatiya Nagar...
S. 9 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 talks about which of the following ?
An accused person is detained in police custody for investigation of a cognizable offence. After 24 hours, the police officer desires to continue the de...
Austin has propounded the theory of?
Who is the designated authority for the regulation and supervision of payment systems under the Payment and Settlement Systems Act?
Presumption under Section 113A of Indian Evidence Act pertains to
Consider the following statements regarding the prohibition on the use of company name under Section 5 of the Companies Act, 2013:
Statement 1...