Question
Which of the following statement is not true?
Study the following information carefully and answer the below questions. There are three rows Row1, Row2 & Row3. Row1 is immediate north of row2 and Row3 is immediate south of Row2. Eight person sits in row2 and 4 person sits in each row1 and row3. First four person from left end of row2 sits facing person in row1, similarly first four person from right end of row2 sits facing person from row3. N sits third to right of D, who sits facing Q. L sits third to right of K. M and K doesn’t sit together. Neither L nor K sits at end of the row. Y neither sits adjacent to Q nor sits adjacent to N. No person sits left of Q. Z sits in any row north of O’s row. The one who sits facing Y, sits second to right of M. X sits immediate left of J, who sits facing south. K sits facing R, who sits immediate right of G. One person sits between P and F, who sits facing A.Solution
We have: N sits third to right of D, who sits facing Q. No person sits left of Q. That means, in case (1) Q sits at left end of Row1, in case (2) Q sits left end of Row3. L sits third to right of K. Neither L nor K sits at end of the row. K sits facing R, who sits immediate right of G. That means, in case (1a) L sits immediate left of D, in case (1b) L sits immediate right of D, in case (2a) L sits immediate left of D, in case (2b) L sits immediate right of D. Based on above given information we have: Case-2a
Again, we have: The one who sits facing Y, sits second to right of M. M and K doesn’t sit together. Y neither sits adjacent to Q nor sits adjacent to N. That means, in case (1a) M sits immediate right of Q, in case (1b) M sits immediate left of N, in case (2a) M sits immediate right of M, in case (2b) M sits immediate left of N. One person sits between P and F, who sits facing A. That means, in case (1b) A sits immediate right of R, in case (2b) A sits immediate right of A, case (1a) & case (2a) are not valid. X sits immediate left of J, who sits facing south. That means, in case (2b) X sits immediate right of Y, case (1b) is not valid. Z sits in any row north of O’s row. That means, in case (2b) Z sits immediate left of Y and O sits immediate left of L. Based on above given information we have final arrangement as follows:
Case (1a) & case (2a) are not valid as one person sits between P and F, who sits facing A, case (1b) is not valid as X sits immediate left of J, who sits facing south.
The President of India is elected indirectly by the electoral college consisting of the elected members of the:
Which of the following provisions has been newly introduced under BNSS, 2023 to promote the use of technology in criminal procedure?Â
Among the following which section deals with the admissibility of Evidence shall be decided by the Judge_____
The power of superintendence over CBI in corruption cases was judicially recognized in:Â
A wishes to prove, by secondary evidence, the contents of a lost document.
Consider the following statements regarding Evidence Act applicability in PMLA proceedings:
Statement 1: Hearsay evidence is admissible in PMLA...
The Vigilance Commissioner may act as the Central Vigilance Commissioner when the office of CVC is vacant as per:Â
'la principle de legalite' means:
What conditions must be met for the Authority to grant a certificate of registration to an applicant to operate as an insurer under the Insurance Act?
Are official communications protected under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872? If yes, under which section?