Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Conclusion I: The statement explicitly mentions that the scheme aims to improve nutritional levels, which implies that nutritional deficiency is a concern.
So, Conclusion I follows. Conclusion II: The scheme also aims to reduce dropout rates, and it is based on the assumption that providing food may keep students in school. So, it is reasonable to infer that lack of food could be a reason for dropouts.
So, Conclusion II also follows.
The average income of three employees, namely Amit, Bisht, and Cherry, is Rs. 24000. Bisht's income is 10% higher than Amit's, and Cherry's income is 50...
The expenditure-to-savings ratio for Person 'A' is 5:4. If their income rises by 25% and their savings grow by 31.25%, what perce...
The monthly salary of a woman is increased by Rs. 600. If her old salary was 25% less than her new salary, find her old salary.
The income to expenditure ratio for Pawan and Qureshi is 5:2 and 5:3, respectively. If the sum of their incomes is Rs. 5,500 and Pawan's savings are Rs....
The income of Amit is Rs. 12,000 greater than Bhuvan's income. Amit spends 75% of his income, whereas Bhuvan's expenditure is 80% of Amit's expenditure....
The ratio of the monthly income of C and D is 9:14, respectively, and their expenditures are Rs. 1500 and Rs. 3500, respectively. Find the difference be...
Anmol's expenditure is 30% higher than Bhanu's expenditure, and Anmol's savings exceed Bhanu's savings by Rs. 2000. The ratio of ...
A company has three departments: A, B, and C. The total monthly salary expenditure is ₹1,200,000. Department A spends 50% of the total salary, Departm...
Neha spends 60% of her monthly income. If her monthly income increased by 35% and her expenditure remained the same, then she would be able to save Rs. ...