Question
In each question below are given three statements
followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All writes are recitations. All poets are recitations. All recitations are gamblers. Conclusions: I. All writes are gamblers. II. All poets are gamblers. III. Some gamblers are writes.Solution
All writes are recitations. (A) + All recitations are gamblers(A) = All writes are gamblers(A). Hence, conclusion I will follow. All poets are recitations (A) + All recitations are gamblers(A) = All poets are gamblers. Hence, conclusion II will also follow.All writes are gamblers(A) ⇒ conversion ⇒ Some gamblers are write (I). Hence, conclusion III will also follow.
'A' a soldier, fires on a mob by the order of his superior officers in conformity with the commands of the law. A has committed no offence, his defense...
The Supreme Court has recently delivered a judgment expounding the doctrine of "lis pendens in case of –
Under Section 15 of the Credit Information Companies (Regulation) Act, 2005, a Regional Rural Bank (RRB) was established as a credit institution on Marc...
Which section of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 deals with Leading questions?
Provisions of condition and warranty are in which section of Sales of Goods Act, 1930?
Which of the following is not essential to constitute the tort of negligence?
What is meant by "free consent" in contract law?
The doctrine of “Res Gestae” is incorporated under which section of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?
On what grounds can the chairperson or member of FSSAI be removed?
Which Legislations are getting repealed on enforcement of IBC?Â
Relevant for Exams:
