Question
In each question below are given three statements
followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All writes are recitations. All poets are recitations. All recitations are gamblers. Conclusions: I. All writes are gamblers. II. All poets are gamblers. III. Some gamblers are writes.Solution
All writes are recitations. (A) + All recitations are gamblers(A) = All writes are gamblers(A). Hence, conclusion I will follow. All poets are recitations (A) + All recitations are gamblers(A) = All poets are gamblers. Hence, conclusion II will also follow.All writes are gamblers(A) β conversion β Some gamblers are write (I). Hence, conclusion III will also follow.
What is the purpose of the "if __name__ == '__main__':" statement in a Python script?
How can we set default rwx permission to all users on every file which is created on the current shell?
Which type of diode allows current to flow in only one direction?
A control unit in a CPU uses a microprogram to:
What is the purpose of a lock in concurrency control?
What is the purpose of a symbol table in lexical analysis?
Used to manage the layout of page
What is the function of a web server in web technology?
What is the primary goal of requirement analysis in software development?
F={PR`` ST, PSU`` QR} which of the following is trivial functional dependency in F closure?