Question
Three statements are given, followed by three
conclusions numbered I, II, and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All phones are tablets. No tablet is a calculator. All drives are calculators.       Conclusions: I. Some drives are phones. II. Some calculators are phones. III. No tablet is a drive.Solution
All phones are tablets (A) + No tablet is a calculator (E) → No phone is a calculator (E) + Some calculators are drives (I) → Some drives are not phones (O*). Hence neither conclusion I nor II follow. All drives are calculators (A) + No calculator is a tablet (E) → No drive is a tablet (E) → Conversion → No tablet is a drive (E). Hence conclusion III follow.
What is the term period of imprisonment that is imposed on a person who obstructs the Chief Inspector, to make an entry, inspection, examination, or inq...
As per section 3 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, who has the power to appoint special Judges?
A voluntarily confession is admissible in evidence.
IPC extend to ……….
Under Section 4 of the Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) Act, 2008, what is the legal relationship between the provisions of the Indian Partnership Ac...
When is the offence of abetment considered complete as per the provisions of IPC?
A copy of the financial statement, including consolidated financial statement, if any, along with all the documents which are required to be or attached...
A makes an attempt to steal some jewels by breaking open a box, and finds after so opening the box, that there is no jewel in it.
Article 2 of the Constitution of India (As amended) states. Parliament may by law ________ new states on such terms and conditions as it thinks fit.
The Court, after the case has been heard, shall pronounce judgment, and ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ_______________.
Relevant for Exams:
