Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Statement: India is a country of multiple languages. Conclusion I: All Indians can speak multiple languages. This conclusion assumes that because India is a country of multiple languages, all Indians can speak multiple languages. However, the statement does not imply that every individual in India can speak multiple languages, just that the country itself has multiple languages. Therefore, Conclusion I does not logically follow from the statement. Conclusion II: Every country has multiple languages. This conclusion generalizes the specific information about India to all countries. The statement only provides information about India and does not mention or imply anything about the linguistic diversity of other countries. Therefore, Conclusion II does not logically follow from the statement either. Given these analyses, the correct answer is: 2. Neither conclusion I nor II follows
Doctrine of Res gestae is an exception to?
Which section of the Prevention of Corruption Act delas with the provisions of appeal and revision?
Which of the following is a valid offer?
Which of the following cases laid down the rule of Strict-Liability?
The examination of a witness subsequent to a ________, by________ is Re-examination.
A person is presumed to be alive if it is shown that he was alive within ………… years
Professional communications between a client and his attorney are protected :
Can anyone use “Limited” or “Private Limited” word as per wish? If no what is the penalty for improper use of “Limited” or “Private Limite...
Upon complete liquidation of the assets of a corporate debtor, to which authority should the liquidator make an application for the dissolution of the c...
The concept of Ombudsman first originated in: