Question
If the consonants of the following words are arranged
first, followed by the vowels as per the English alphabetical order and then the consonants are changed to the next letter and the vowels are changed to the previous letter in the English alphabetical series, then what will be the second consonants from the right end of each of the words after the rearrangement? I. CAREFREE II. JUBILIANT III. NEPHEWSolution
I. CAREFREE II. JUBILIANT III. NEPHEW After arranging the consonants first followed by vowels as per the English alphabetical order, we get: I. CFRRAEEE    II. BJLNTAIIU   III. NHPWEE After changing the consonants to the next letter and the vowels to the previous letter in the English alphabetical series, we get:  I. DGSSZDDD II. CKMOUZHHT III. OIQXDD The second consonant from the right end of each of the words is: I. DGSSZDDD: D II. CKMOUZHHT: H III. OIQXDD: D
- Select the option that is related to the third term in the same way as the second term is related to first term and the sixth term is related to the fifth ...
Given set: 374, 635, 725
Select the combination of letters that when sequentially placed in the blanks of the given letter series will complete the series.
_ h _ i j _ _ ...
Select the option that is related to the third number in the same way as the second number is related to first number and the sixth number is related to...
158 : 491 :: 231 : ?
Select the odd group of numbers. (NOTE: Operations should be performed on the whole numbers, without breaking down the numbers into its constituent digi...
Select the option in which the words share the same relationship as that shared by the given pair of words.
Lion : Cub
- Select the set in which the numbers are related in the same way as are the numbers of the following set. (NOTE: Operations should be performed on the whole...
Select the related word/letters/number from the given alternatives.
7: 56 :: 5:?
34 is related to 155 by certain logic. Following the same logic, 49 is related to 168. To which of the following is 68 related, following the same logic?