Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
From I: We have: Only two person sits between Z and R. Z sits at left end. Only one person sits between W and R, who doesn’t sit with Z, that means W sits second to right of R. D sits third to right of M, neither of them sits adjacent to R or W. Only three person sits between D and H, who doesn’t sit adjacent to W, that means D sits at extreme right end. At least two person sits between W and O, who neither sits adjacent to D nor Z, that means we have two different case, in case (1) O sits left of W, in case (2) O sits right of W. Based on above given information we have: case-1 Hence, statement I is not sufficient. From II: We have: R sits fourth from left end. Only one person sits between Z and R, that means we have two possible place for Z, in case (1) Z sits second to left of R, in case (2) Z sits second to right of R. Only two person sits between O and D. D sits at end of the row. Only two person sits between H and O, who sits immediate left of M, that means D sits at extreme right end and case (2) is not valid. Based on above given information we have:
Clearly, only six person sits between Z and O. Hence, statement II alone sufficient
मन्त्र नामक सॉफ्टवेयर किसके द्वारा विकसित किया गया ?
कोई कामिरिक पोरबंदर स्थित केंद्र सरकार के किसी कार्यालय �...
संघ या राज्य की भाषा से संबंधित 'विशेष निदेश' संविधान के भा...
इसके अलावा जीएसटी क्षतिपूर्ति की पूरी राशि भी राज्यों को �...
Our adversary shall continue with their efforts to achieve their strategic aims.
दिए गए अंग्रेजी शब्दों के लिए एक हिन्दी पर्याय का चयन कीजि...
किसी भी कार्यालय मे राजभाषा नीति के अनुपालन का दायित्व नि�...
संसदीय समिति ने अपनी प्रथम बैठक के बाद, राष्ट्रपति के समक्...
निम्न मे से कौन सा कथन असत्य है ?
(i) संविधान में 14 सितम्ब�...
निम्नलिखित शब्दों पर विचार कीजिए :
1. अपकर्ति
2. कुमुद�...