Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Given statement: C < P > T = E < R; G > R > A < D For conclusion I: T < G : - G > R > E = T, it is true. For conclusion II: G ≥ P – G > R > E = T < P, there is no relation between G and P, it is not true. For conclusion III: T > A – T = E < R > A it is not true.
Landlord may recover possession of premises if the tenant has created on the premises any permanent structure without consent of landlord, the permanent...
In which of the following cases has the Supreme Court observed that the issue of limitation is a jurisdictional issue which should be decided by the ar...
Under IPC, where no sum is expressed to which a fine may extend, the amount of fine to which the offender is liable
Which section of Hindu Succession Act mentions that the property of a female Hindu is to be her absolute property?
Where any electronic record, purporting or proved to be ___________ years old, is produced from any custody which the Court in the particular case consi...
For what can a specific relief be granted__________
Any industrial dispute or any matter appearing to be connected with, or relevant to the dispute specified in the Second Schedule of the Industrial Dispu...
Which of the following test determines that damage is remote or not?
a. Test of reasonable foresight
b. Test of directness
c. Test ...
26th November is celebrated as which of the following day in India?
As per the IBC Insolvency Commencement date means___________________