Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Given statement: K > L ≥ M > N, N < O < P = J For conclusion I: K ≥ O: - K > L ≥ M > N < O, there is no relation between K and O, it doesn’t follows For conclusion II: P > L: - L ≥ M > N < O < P, there is no relation between P and L, it doesn’t follows For conclusion III: L > J: - L ≥ M > N < O < P = J, there is no relation between L and J, it doesn’t follows
Which legal maxim had been applied in the case Hadley v. Baxendale?
A was found guilty of money laundering as per the provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002. What possible actions can be taken against A?
According to section 21 of the Prevention of Corruption Act______________ shall be a competent witness for the defence and may give evidence on oath in ...
As per the Special Contract Act how can delivery to the bailee be effectively made?
Which of the following jurists is associated with the 'Pure Theory of Law'?
Which of the following statement with reference to section 3 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, is not correct?
S. 32 of the Indian Evidence act covers:
Which of the Labour Code was enacted in 2019?
Written communication shall be made by ___________ to the President before a Proclamation is issued by him under Art. 352 (1).
Which of the following Articles of the Constitution provides for Finance Commission?