Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Get Started with ixamBee
Start learning 50% faster. Sign in nowM sits opposite to the one who sits third to the left of G. Either M or G is sitting at the end of the row. From the above condition, there are two possibilities. Only one person sits between M and N. The number of persons sitting to the left of N is the same as to the right of R. From the above condition, there are three possibilities.
Only two persons are sitting between R and the one who sits opposite to A. The number of persons who sits between A and N is the same as between V and S. V and R are not immediate neighbors. D sits to the right of E and does not face A. From the above condition, case1 and case2a get eliminated. Case-2
K sits to the left of L and to the right of J. From the above condition, case2 shows the final arrangement.
The theory of comparative advantage in a two−country, two−commodity world can only work if
Comparative advantage is based on
Leontief Preferences are related to
What is the rate of income tax paid ...
Which scenario best describes the 'trilemma' or 'impossible trinity' in the context of the Mundell-Fleming Model?
A worker’s wage in 1996 was Rs.180. What should be the wage in 1999 so that the worker remains at the same level of consumption? [Consider 1995 as the...
For two correlated variables x and y, if coefficient of correlation between x and y is 0.8014, variance of x and y are 16 and 25 respectively....
If a tax is placed on the product in this market, tax revenue paid by the buyers is the area
Judging from the figure, a person that chooses to consume bundle C is likely to
For which preferences the income offer curve and the price offer curve are equal?